Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 7 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a171
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a171
Nicholas Henschke, postdoctoral fellow1,2, Christopher G Maher, director of division1,2, Kathryn M Refshauge, professor2, Robert D Herbert, associate professor1,2, Robert G Cumming, professor3, Jane Bleasel, rheumatologist4, John York, rheumatologist4, Anurina Das, research officer2, James H McAuley, research manager1,2
1 Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia, 2 Back Pain Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, 3 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, 4 Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney
Correspondence to: C G Maher, PO Box M201, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia cmaher{at}george.org.au
Design Cohort study with one year follow-up.
Setting Primary care clinics in Sydney, Australia.
Participants An inception cohort of 973 consecutive primary care patients (mean age 43.3, 54.8% men) with non-specific low back pain of less than two weeks duration recruited from the clinics of 170 general practitioners, physiotherapists, and chiropractors.
Main outcome measures Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and were contacted six weeks, three months, and 12 months after the initial consultation. Recovery was assessed in terms of return to work, return to function, and resolution of pain. The association between potential prognostic factors and time to recovery was modelled with Cox regression.
Results The follow-up rate over the 12 months was more than 97%. Half of those who reduced their work status at baseline had returned to previous work status within 14 days (95% confidence interval 11 to 17 days) and 83% had returned to previous work status by three months. Disability (median recovery time 31 days, 25 to 37 days) and pain (median 58 days, 52 to 63 days) took much longer to resolve. Only 72% of participants had completely recovered 12 months after the baseline consultation. Older age, compensation cases, higher pain intensity, longer duration of low back pain before consultation, more days of reduced activity because of lower back pain before consultation, feelings of depression, and a perceived risk of persistence were each associated with a longer time to recovery.
Conclusions In this cohort of patients with acute low back pain in primary care, prognosis was not as favourable as claimed in clinical practice guidelines. Recovery was slow for most patients. Nearly a third of patients did not recover from the presenting episode within a year.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses