BMJ 1994;308:1251-1252 (14 May)
Editorials
Syncope
Any lay person can recognise a common faint. Doctors find the diagnosis more difficult and complicate matters further by describing the condition as vasovagal or vasodepressor syncope. To be fair, doctors see more of the people whose faints are atypical and therefore tend to feel uneasy when someone loses consciousness in a public place. Hospital doctors' disquiet is compounded nowadays by the lack of a reliable and reproducible diagnostic test. When people who faint present to hospital, therefore, they tend to be subjected to expensive investigation. Every decade or so there is a reminder that such tests are unnecessary.1,2
Most people who faint do not consult a doctor. Hence the prevalence of fainting is difficult to gauge; nearly a quarter of an elderly population admitted to having fainted once in the previous 10 years.3 Patients with syncope (not quite the same thing as fainting) can account for 3% of all . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Syncope A good history is not enough
- R Sutton, A Nathan, J Perrins, D Skehan, W Y N Davies, and R A Kenny
BMJ 1994 309: 474.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chadwick, D., Smith, D.
(2002). The misdiagnosis of epilepsy. BMJ
324: 495-496
[Full text]
-
Smith, D., Defalla, B.A., Chadwick, D.W.
(1999). The misdiagnosis of epilepsy and the management of refractory epilepsy in a specialist clinic. QJM
92: 15-23
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Sutton, R, Nathan, A, Perrins, J, Skehan, D, Davies, W Y N, Kenny, R A
(1994). Syncope A good history is not enough. BMJ
309: 474a-474
[Full text]