BMJ 1994;308:1653-1654 (25 June)

Editorials

Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Involving patients in decisions about their care is morally, legally, and clinically desirable, whatever their age. The use of do not resuscitate orders, when a decision is made not to give a patient cardiopulmonary resuscitation, is common. In the United States patient consent is a universal requirement for do not resuscitate orders and is enshrined in hospital policies and state law. in Britain this approach is resisted on the grounds that it replaces the humane tradition of medical care with a formulaic adherence to policy.1 But the ethical principle of respect for patients' autonomy and the practical objective of benefiting patients with minimal harm necessitate involving patients in these decisions.2

We need to establish humane, valid, and reliable ways of ascertaining patients' views. Only when discussing do not resuscitate orders would harm patients, or when cardiopulmonary resuscitation would be futile, should competent patients not be consulted. Three papers in this . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Resuscitation and patients' views Questioning may be misunderstood by patients
A Heller, J Potter, I Sturgess, A Owen, P McCormack, J Liddle, F Haas, N J Dudley, J A Carter, C J N Meystre, S Ahmedzai, and N M J Burley
BMJ 1994 309: 408. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Harris, D., Davies, R. (2007). An audit of "do not attempt resuscitation" decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?. Postgrad. Med. J. 83: 137-140 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Sivakumar, R, Knight, J, Devlin, C, Keir, P, Ghosh, P, Khan, S (2004). Communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to hospitalised patients. J. Med. Ethics 30: 311-312 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van Mil, A. H.M., van Klink, R. C.J., Huntjens, C., Westendorp, R. G.J., Stiggelbout, A. M., Meinders, A.E., Lagaay, A. M. (2000). Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences in Dutch Community-dwelling and Hospitalized Elderly People: An Interaction between Gender and Quality of Life. Med Decis Making 20: 423-429 [Abstract]  
  • Williamson, C. (2000). Consumer and professional standards: working towards consensus. Qual Saf Health Care 9: 190-194 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thorns, A R, Ellershaw, J E (1999). A survey of nursing and medical staff views on the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospice. Palliat Med 13: 225-232 [Abstract]  
  • Smith, A M, Twycross, R, Madeley, P, Gilbert, J, Ventafridda, V, Thomson, H J, Fergusson, A, Saunders, P, Finlay, I G, Norris, P, Ward, B, Tate, P (1994). Euthanasia: Present law protects doctors and patients. BMJ 309: 471a-471 [Full text]  
  • Heller, A, Potter, J, Sturgess, I, Owen, A, McCormack, P, Liddle, J, Haas, F, Dudley, N J, Carter, J A, Meystre, C J N, Ahmedzai, S, Burley, N M J (1994). Resuscitation and patients' views Questioning may be misunderstood by patients. BMJ 309: 408-408 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ