BMJ 1995;310:681-682 (18 March)

Editorials

The outcomes of neonatal intensive care

Let's use the results of research into early intervention

Deform'd, unfinish'd, sent before my time Into this breathing world, scarce half made up, And that so lamely and unfashionable That dogs bark at me, as I halt by them;1

Shakespeare identified the association between prematurity and disability 300 years before Little's classic description of spastic diplegia in 1862. Disability in surviving premature infants is still an important problem, particularly in those of extremely low birth weight.2 Most of the data on the incidence of disability and the costs and benefits of neonatal intensive care units come from a few research centres. A broader picture could be obtained by a standardised nationwide approach to the collection of data. There are two separate issues. Firstly, what are the outcomes of interest and how should they be monitored? Secondly, what proportion of childhood disability is attributable to the increased survival of babies nursed . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Outcomes of neonatal intensive care
David Field
BMJ 1995 310: 1602. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dawson, C., Perkins, M., Draper, E., Johnson, A., Field, D. (1997). Are outcome data regarding the survivors of neonatal care available from routine sources?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 77: 206F-210 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Johnson, A. (1997). Follow up studies: a case for a standard minimum data set. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 76: 61F-63 [Full text]  
  • Field, D. (1995). Outcomes of neonatal intensive care. BMJ 310: 1602a-1602 [Full text]  
Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student BMJ
Listen to the latest BMJ Interview