Letters
Dentist is aggrieved at outcome
EDITOR,--I was the dentist involved in the case discussed by John Mitchell and others.1 I wish to point out that I was found guilty of assault on two patients--the woman mentioned and a young boy. The anaesthesist, however, was found guilty of assault on only the woman. Having played no part in the decision to administer the diclofenac suppository or in its administration and, as Mitchell wrote, having not even touched the suppository, I feel very aggrieved by the outcome.Dentist Bramley, Hampshire RG26 5DH
M M A Laljee
- Mitchell J, Jones MA, Lunn JN. A fundamental problem of consent. BMJ 1995;310:43-8. (7 January.)
[Free Full Text]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
- A fundamental problem of consent
- John Mitchell
BMJ 1995 310: 43-46.[Extract] [Full Text]
This Article
- Full text
- Respond to this article
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when responses are posted
- Alert me when a correction is posted
Services
- Email this article to a friend
- Find similar articles in BMJ
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Related Content
Bookmark with
What's new
Latest blogs
Services
Tools
Online poll
Resources
Rapid responses for this article
There are no rapid responses for this article.Most read
Print issues
