Editorials

Commissioning complementary medicine

The opportunities presented to commissioning health authorities to decide what health care to purchase for local people has also provided an opportunity to rethink old prejudices. The old prejudices against complementary medicine are being rethought for several reasons. Firstly, many commissioning authorities and fundholding general practitioners are either commissioning or providing complementary medicine as part of routine contracting.¹ Financially, this is marginal activity, costing typically less than pounds sterling20000 a year out of an average authority budget of pounds sterling200m. Also some complementary medicines, such as acupuncture and homoeopathy, have been part of normal NHS activity for many years and this has blurred the margins between conventional and complementary medicine. Secondly, the medical profession has relaxed its attitude toward complementary medicine over the past decade.² Thirdly, both main political parties support the development of complementary medicine as an issue of . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Commissioning complementary medicine

Thurstan Brewin and John Garrow
BMJ 1995 311: 809. [Extract] [Full Text]

Homoeopathic hospitals have unique skill

Peter Fisher and Anne Eden
BMJ 1995 311: 809. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ernst, E. (1997). Integrating complementary medicine?. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 117: 285-286  
• Ernst, E, Abbot, N C (1996). Research priorities in complementary medicine. BMJ 312: 1481c-1482 [Full text]  
• Brewin, T., Garrow, J. (1995). Commissioning complementary medicine. BMJ 311: 809-809 [Full text]  
• Fisher, P., Eden, A. (1995). Homoeopathic hospitals have unique skill. BMJ 311: 809a-809 [Full text]