BMJ 1995;310:1281-1282 (20 May)

Editorials

The importance of clinical skills

High technology investigations do not diminish the need for clinical skills

The advance of medicine depends on the union of clinical art with high technology science. Sophisticated investigative methods improve clinical awareness and ability, but doctors and nurses must know how to interpret the results produced by the instruments they use. They must be aware of the limitations and possibilities of error. Uncritical reliance on values obtained by machines can be dangerous.1

Over 100 hundred years ago Anstie commented on the value of the sphygmograph but warned that it should be "used in conjunction with the strictest and most diligent observance of other means of clinical research."2 Thirty years ago Godber wrote, "Though mechanical aids and measuring devices extend the capacity of the doctors to serve the patient, they do not replace him. They are the adjuncts to the human relationship between doctor and nurse and patient; they cannot replace . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student BMJ
Listen to the latest BMJ Interview