BMJ 1995;310:1327-1328 (20 May)

Letters

Inaccurate data may lead to insufficient resources

EDITOR,--We agree with Clive Richards and colleagues that accurate ascertainment is a problem for cancer registries.1 One of us (ACB) recently completed an audit of skin cancer care in the former South East Kent health district.

Index cases of melanoma were identified, by date of diagnosis, from histology records for inpatients and outpatients at the district's three hospitals for the year starting 1 April 1991. A small number of cases from general practitioners was also identified from the same source. Thirty six cases of primary cutaneous melanoma were identified. For the calendar year 1991 the Thames Cancer Registry recorded 19 cases of melanoma. The sampling frame for the local study accounted only for lesions verified histologically, but the cancer registry includes lesions not verified histologically. When this factor is taken into account the registry recorded only 16 cases of melanoma confirmed histologically, which is a substantial difference.

All cancer registries . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Skin cancer: how accurate are local data?
Clive Richards, Hilary Richards, and Derek Pheby
BMJ 1995 310: 503. [Full Text]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview