BMJ 1995;310:1467 (3 June)

Letters

Should doctors have a dual role, preserving life and assisting death?

EDITOR,--If we ever have formal state approved euthanasia or assisted suicide, is there any need for the doctors looking after the patient to be involved in any way in the actual doing of it? Indeed, is any doctor needed at this final stage?

Serious consideration of this particular option, should the law be changed, has been urged before,1 but is not considered in articles on euthanasia including those in the BMJ of 11 and 18 March.2 3 It always seems to be assumed that if you legalise assisted suicide you need a doctor to do it.

One day, in some brave new world (hoped for by some, dreaded by others) assisted suicide may come to be regarded as the right of every citizen purely on the grounds of autonomy. Until then the doctors looking after a patient--and presumably at least one independent doctor--will always be needed to advise on at least . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview