Editorials

Assessing the quality of care

Everyone wants information on clinical outcomes.¹ These measures have an intuitive appeal: high quality care should be reflected by good outcomes. Therefore, poorer outcomes should indicate deficiencies in care, including missed opportunities or wasted resources. The hope is that data on outcomes will provide a barometer for health care, indicating the effectiveness and efficiency of service delivery.

Many purchasers are pushing to include outcomes criteria in their contracts as a means of assessing effectiveness. In clinical audit, measurement of outcome is generally considered superior to audits that simply assess the process of care.² But perhaps this emphasis on outcomes is being overplayed. Are outcomes data always so enlightening?

Outcome measures have a major weakness: interpretation. Suppose a hospital reported that patients admitted with coronary heart disease in 1994 had a 30 day mortality of 25%. This can be interpreted . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Labarere, J., Bosson, J.-L., Sevestre, M.-A., Sellier, E., Richaud, C., Legagneux, A. (2007). Intervention targeted at nurses to improve venous thromboprophylaxis. Int J Qual Health Care 19: 301-308 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Alberti, H., Boudriga, N., Nabli, M. (2007). "Damm Sokkor": Factors Associated With the Quality of Care of Patients With Diabetes: A study in primary care in Tunisia. Diabetes Care 30: 2013-2018 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hulshof, C T J, Verbeek, J H A M, Braam, I T J, Bovenzi, M, van Dijk, F J H (2006). Evaluation of an occupational health intervention programme on whole-body vibration in forklift truck drivers: a controlled trial. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 461-468 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Powell, A E, Davies, H T O, Thomson, R G (2003). Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 122-128 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Campbell, S M, Braspenning, J, Hutchinson, A, Marshall, M (2002). Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 358-364 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Goddard, M., Davies, H. T O, Dawson, D., Mannion, R., McInnes, F. (2002). Clinical performance measurement: part 1--getting the best out of it. JRSM 95: 508-510 [Full text]  
• Ripouteau, C., Conort, O., Lamas, J. P., Auleley, G.-R., Hazebroucq, G., Durieux, P. (2000). Quality improvement report: Effect of multifaceted intervention promoting early switch from intravenous to oral acetaminophen for postoperative pain: controlled, prospective, before and after study. BMJ 321: 1460-1463 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Durieux, P., Nizard, R., Ravaud, P., Mounier, N., Lepage, E. (2000). A Clinical Decision Support System for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Effect on Physician Behavior. JAMA 283: 2816-2821 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Marshall, M. N, Shekelle, P. G, Leatherman, S., Brook, R. H (2000). Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience. Qual Saf Health Care 9: 53-57 [Full text]  
• McQuillan, P., Pilkington, S., Allan, A., Taylor, B., Short, A., Morgan, G., Nielsen, M., Barrett, D., Smith, G. (1998). Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ 316: 1853-1858 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Crombie, I. K (1998). Over half of proposed indicators for hospitals' performance relate to surgery. BMJ 316: 70-70 [Full text]  
• Yates, D. (1997). Regional trauma systems. BMJ 315: 1321-1322 [Full text]  
• Hayward, J. (1996). Promoting clinical effectiveness. BMJ 312: 1491-1492 [Full text]  
• Davenport, R. J, Dennis, M. S (1996). Assessing the quality of care. BMJ 312: 185a-185 [Full text]