Editorials

The scientific basis of health services

The relation between science and health services has until recently been too casual, said Alan Langlands, chief executive of the National Health Service (NHS), at last week's London conference on the scientific basis of health services. The primary job of medical research has been to understand the mechanisms of disease and produce new treatments, not to worry about the effectiveness of the new treatments or their implementation. As a result many new treatments have taken years to become part of routine practice, ineffective treatments have been widely used, and medicine has been opinion rather than evidence based. "There has been," said Sam Their, president of the Massachusetts General Hospital, "a failure of leadership in health research and too little investment in assessing new technologies."

Yet in the United States the new congress is proposing to increase the $11.25 billion budget of . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Banatvala, N., Zwi, A. B (2000). Conflict and health: Public health and humanitarian interventions: developing the evidence base. BMJ 321: 101-105 [Full text]  
• Grol, R. (1997). Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 315: 418-421 [Full text]  
• Smith, R. (1997). Does the world need the BMJ?. BMJ 314: 1-1 [Full text]  
• Armstrong, D., Reyburn, H., Jones, R. (1996). A study of general practitioners' reasons for changing their prescribing behaviour. BMJ 312: 949-952 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gill, P, Dowell, A C, Neal, R D, Smith, N, Heywood, P, Wilson, A E (1996). Evidence based general practice: a retrospective study of interventions in one training practice. BMJ 312: 819-821 [Abstract] [Full text]