BMJ 1995;311:1449-1450 (2 December)

Editorials

Fetal surgery

New techniques have given surgeons a second chance

Operating on the fetus became technically feasible over 10 years ago,1 but it has remained semiexperimental; fetal surgery is attempted for strictly selected indications in a handful of centres worldwide. The slow progress of fetal surgery in the past decade and its poor survival record (19% for diaphragmatic hernia repair2) have led to assertions that it is a blind alley.

Yet many of the obstacles to success have been overcome. The technical aspects of operating on such fragile patients have been refined--paralleling the progress in postnatal surgery on very small and very premature infants. Postoperative uterine contractions, the most feared hazard of fetal surgery, can be better controlled by safe and effective drugs. Selection of patients has improved to reduce the chances of a fetus being needlessly exposed to antenatal intervention and its inherent risks. Finally, research has opened up alternative . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kimber, C, Spitz, L, Cuschieri, A (1997). Current state of antenatal in utero surgical interventions. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 76: 134F-139 [Full text]  
  • Kilby, M. D, Whittle, M. J (1996). Benefits of fetal surgery must be carefully evaluated. BMJ 312: 780a-780 [Full text]  
Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student BMJ
Listen to the latest BMJ Interview