BMJ 1995;311:1638-1639 (16 December)

Letters

If a woman has not had a thrombotic event in years of use she is unlikely to have one now

EDITOR,--My editorial commenting on the letter from the Committee on Safety of Medicines and the three studies that gave rise to it had to be cut because of lack of space.1 In the original version I argued that, in these trials, the proportion of women who had been exposed in the past to ethinyloestradiol (in any combination) might be higher among current users of the third generation pills containing desogestrel and gestodene; ethinyloestradiol is still recognised as the prime prothrombotic constituent of contraceptive pills. This difference would effectively mean that a smaller proportion of women taking the longer established pills had hereditary disorders of coagulation (since such women would have stopped using the pill early because they had had a thromboembolic event). The users of products containing levonorgestrel and norethisterone might then comprise, in effect, a population of survivors who are less at risk of the condition under study. I . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Advising women on which pill to take
John Guillebaud
BMJ 1995 311: 1111-1112. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview