BMJ 2001;323:819-820 ( 13 October )

Editorials

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults

Revised guidelines are more evidence based

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The United Kingdom's guidelines on advanced life support for adults were updated in 1997 and endorsed by the European Resuscitation Council in 1998.1 During 1999 and 2000 the American Heart Association hosted three meetings of international organisations in Dallas to evaluate the evidence on resuscitation. The sets of guidelines that resulted from the international consensus document have a stronger evidence base than their predecessors but have retained their simplicity. 2 3

Experts at the Dallas meetings included representatives from the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Australian Resuscitation Council, the New Zealand Resuscitation Council, the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, the Latin American Resuscitation Council, and Japan. All aspects of resuscitation were reviewed, and the quality of the evidence supporting each resuscitation intervention was appraised. 2 3 The European Resuscitation Council has accepted most of the recommendations from the international consensus document, and its revised guidelines for adults . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Neerkin, J, Riley, J (2006). Ethical aspects of palliative care in lung cancer and end stage lung disease. Chronic Respiratory Disease 3: 93-101 [Abstract]  
  • France, J, Wilson, S, Whitton, N (2006). Auditory and visual prompts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department.. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 160-161 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ