Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1196-1197 (20 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1196
Is a scientific advance, but it could worsen overall blood glucose control
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The detection of sugars in the urine of people with diabetes usually is attributed to Matthew Dobson. However, first attempts at quantification of urine sugars seem to have been made by Francis Home, an Edinburgh physician. Estimation of urine sugar as a measure of severity of diabetes had two major problems that, until recently, were shared with its contemporary equivalent, estimation of glycated haemoglobin. Firstly, both are surrogate measures of the average concentration of plasma glucose that is responsible for the microvascular and arterial damage that manifests itself in later years. Secondly, both also included in their measurement non-specific (nonglucose) substances when using available assays. Very recently, the glycated haemoglobin assay has been standardised by the scientific community to remove this non-specificity, but switching to this more accurate method for everyday reporting of results could lead to confusion and worsening of the control of diabetes.
Urine glucose remains of
Philip Home, professor of diabetes medicine
School of Medical Sciences, Diabetes, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH (philip.home@ncl.ac.uk)
Jean-Claude Mbanya, associate professor of medicine
Endocrine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Yaoundé I, BP 8046, Yaoundé 8, Cameroon
Ed Horton, professor of medicine
Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Read all Rapid Responses