Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1097-1098 (14 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7500.1097
Why some authors self archive their articles
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The great current divide in scientific publishing is between open access articlesthat is, those freely available on the internetand non-open access ones, those for which a reader has to pay on order to gain access to them. Before Jonathan Wren's study appeared (p 1128)1 we knew that open access copies of scientific journal articles published in non-open access (subscription based) journals were a fairly small subset of the overall journal literature.2 Wren studied just which subset it was and found that papers from journals with high impact factors were more likely to have free online copies at other locations around the web than papers from low impact journals.
To show why this matters, and why it's puzzling, let's review what we knew before Wren did his study. We knew that some scientists deposited copies of their published articles in open access repositories, a process called self archiving.
Peter Suber, research professor
Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374, USA (peters@earlham.edu)
Read all Rapid Responses