Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:305-306 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7512.305
Seek training, know the rules, take out insurance, and be rigorously impartial
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
After the erasure from the medical register of Professor Sir Roy Meadow on 15 July 2005, doctors acting as expert witnesses may want to remind themselves of their duties and of what might happen if they fail to discharge those duties. Doctors wishing to rise to this challenge would do well to seek training, and many such courses are advertised on the internet. This editorial deals principally with the roles and responsibilities of experts in civil litigation in England and Wales. That said, the principles are broadly applicable to litigation in the criminal and family courts and, to varying degrees, to litigation in other jurisdictions.
Expert witnesses can take sage guidance from the judgment of Mr Justice Cresswell in the "Ikarian Reefer."1 This case involved a Panamanian vessel that ran aground and caught fire; the insurers argued that the vessel was the subject of arson by the owners, and
Mark Friston, barrister specialising in clinical negligence and litigation funding
Kings Chambers, Manchester M2 6BA
mfriston@kingschambers.com
Read all Rapid Responses