BMJ  2006;332:500-501 (4 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7540.500

Editorial

Where expert witnesses fear to tread

In the UK their steps are now more protected

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Since 1997 the environment for expert witnesses in the United Kingdom has been increasingly hostile. This is partly because the UK has taken longer to tackle the issue of experts tending to favour the party instructing them. Unfortunately the calm thinking required to examine the merits of differing systems of ensuring impartial advice, which started in the late 1990s, has more recently been clouded by the emotive issues of child protection. The case of Roy Meadow exemplifies the problem—and now may have prompted a series of solutions.

The original case, in which Meadow gave expert evidence against Sally Clark, a mother who was convicted of murdering two of her children,1 appeared to involve the improper use of statistics,2 although the jury was specifically warned against relying on the statistical evidence given. Sally Clark's conviction was later overturned on appeal, not on the basis of Meadow's evidence but after the . . . [Full text of this article]

M E Jan Wise, consultant in adult psychiatry and chair of BMA medicolegal committee

London NW6 6BX
(jan.wise@nhs.net)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The evidence base in child protection litigation
David L Chadwick
BMJ 2006 333: 160-161. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The price of independence
Joe Collier
BMJ 2006 332: 1447-1449. [Full Text] [PDF]

Expert witnesses are issued with new advice after high profile failings
Clare Dyer
BMJ 2006 332: 381. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Professor Roy Meadow struck off
Clare Dyer
BMJ 2005 331: 177. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Pathologist in Sally Clark case suspended from court work
Clare Dyer
BMJ 2005 330: 1347. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The negligence of medical experts
M C Bishop
BMJ 2004 329: 1353. [Extract] [Full Text]

Women need better information about routine mammography
Hazel Thornton, Adrian Edwards, and Michael Baum
BMJ 2003 327: 101-103. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Conviction by mathematical error?
Stephen J Watkins
BMJ 2000 320: 2-3. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Chadwick, D. L (2006). The evidence base in child protection litigation. BMJ 333: 160-161 [Full text]  
  • Collier, J. (2006). The price of independence.. BMJ 332: 1447-1449 [Full text]  
  • Samanta, A. (2006). Medical experts, the law and professional regulation.. JRSM 99: 217-218 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Citation correct; text needs clarifaction
Peter Gooderham
bmj.com, 3 Mar 2006 [Full text]
The BMA’s "honest errors".
William G. Pickering
bmj.com, 5 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Let the Public Refer Bad Experts to GMC
Jay Ilangaratne
bmj.com, 7 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Experts witnesses essential for the administration of justice
Mark Dudley
bmj.com, 9 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ