Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:376 (24 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39128.449317.BE
Standardised dosing can improve the safety of prescribing
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The use of oral anticancer agents for the treatment of common malignancies has increased over the past few years. Of about 300 new anticancer agents in development, 20-25% are oral products.1 Many novel "target agents" such as inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (for example, erlotinib) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (for example, sunitinib and sorafenib) are given orally. Patients prefer oral agents because they are more convenient, allow greater autonomy, and avoid venepuncture and the associated risks of indwelling venous catheters.2
Despite the advantages of oral anticancer agents, they do pose challenges such as poor compliance, a small but definite risk of unintentional overdose, and a greater risk of drug-drug and drug-food interactions.3 In this week's BMJ, Weingart and colleagues evaluate the safety practices of 62 National Cancer Institute designated centres in the United States with regard to prescribing oral chemotherapy.4 Such institutions would be
Sandeep D Parsad, clinical haematology and oncology pharmacist, Mark J Ratain, Leon O Jacobson professor of medicine
Department of Medicine, Section of Haematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
sandeep.parsad@uchospitals.edu