Published 14 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1023
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1023

Feature

Continuing Medical Education

Pharma and CME: View from the US

¹ department of ambulatory care and prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard, Pilgrim Health Care, Boston MA 02215, USA

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In the United States, commercial support for continuing medical education has grown steadily over the past decade. In 2006 it provided more than half, about $1.5bn (£0.75bn, 0.95bn) or 60%, of the income for educational programmes doctors must take to maintain their medical licences. ¹ Evidence shows that commercial support distorts what doctors learn.

In 2007 I chaired the Josiah Macy, Jr conference on Continuing Education in the Health Professions: Improving Healthcare Through Lifelong Learning (www.josiahmacyfoundation.org). A major recommendation emerging from the conference was that organisations providing accredited continuing education should not receive commercial support from drug or medical device companies.

The Macy report, from the conference, summarised the ethical concerns. Commercial support places doctors and nurses who teach continuing education activities in the untenable position of being paid, directly or indirectly, by the manufacturers of healthcare products about which they teach. Commercial entities have an obligation to make . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Big subjects: education and obesity

Jane Smith
BMJ 2008 337: a1448. [Extract] [Full Text]

End of the free lunch?

Mark Gould
BMJ 2008 337: a1399. [Extract] [Full Text]

Is the relationship between pharma and medical education on the rocks?

Ray Moynihan
BMJ 2008 337: a925. [Extract] [Full Text]