Published 14 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1293
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1293

Editor's Choice

Editor’s choice

Meddling and bearing witness

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

For as long as I can remember the government has been reorganising the NHS, and a series of commentators, ranging from interested outsiders to official auditors, has been saying, in effect, "stop meddling."

The most recent interested outsiders have included Don Berwick and Donald Light in their commentaries on the NHS (BMJ 2008, 26 July, doi: 10.1136/bmj.a838, doi: 10.1136/bmj.a824). This week it’s the turn of the official auditors. The Audit Commission and the Healthcare Commission have recently reported on the success of the latest reforms of the NHS in England, and Gwyn Bevan discusses their findings in an editorial (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a935). The auditors find little evidence of benefit from the four main changes—foundation trusts, greater use of the independent sector, more choice for patients, and payment by results. In dissecting why that is so, Bevan provides a potted history of the NHS and its reforms since . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Zimbabwe’s humanitarian crisis

D Ncayiyana, L London, D Sanders, A Kalebi, and J Kasolo
BMJ 2008 337: a1286. [Extract] [Full Text]

Is choice working for patients in the English NHS?

Gwyn Bevan
BMJ 2008 337: a935. [Extract] [Full Text]

Operational independence for the NHS

Rhema Vaithianathan and Geraint Lewis
BMJ 2008 337: a497. [Extract] [Full Text]

Will the NHS strategic plan benefit patients?

Donald W Light
BMJ 2008 337: a824. [Extract] [Full Text]

A transatlantic review of the NHS at 60

Donald M Berwick
BMJ 2008 337: a838. [Extract] [Full Text]

A more independent NHS

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2007 334: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Online poll

Find out more >>