Published 1 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2540
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2540

Editorials

Cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer

More evidence is needed before they can be recommended for widespread use

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Men with prostate cancer and their healthcare professionals are faced with several options for treating the primary tumour at the time of diagnosis and any recurrence. Newer treatments such as cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound are available in some centres in the United Kingdom and have enthusiastic advocates.

In 2005, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued guidance on cryotherapy and ultrasound treatment saying that "the current evidence on efficacy and safety" seemed "adequate to support their use" in patients with prostate cancer.1 2 But in 2008, NICE published clinical guidelines on prostate cancer which stated that these treatments "are not recommended for men with localised prostate cancer other than in the context of controlled clinical trials comparing their use with established interventions."3 This apparent change of heart caused concern among urologists and even reached the national press.4 However, the advice was not really inconsistent—NICE deemed these . . . [Full text of this article]

Fergus Macbeth, director1, Nathan Bromham, researcher1, Robert Kagan, emeritus chief of radiation oncology2

1 National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff CF10 3AF, 2 Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA

Fergus.Macbeth@nccc.wales.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ