Published 28 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1029
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1029

Letters

Therapeutic ignorance

Human nature seems averse to evidence

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The last sentence of Sir Iain’s article emphasises the role of patients and the public in helping doctors to confront therapeutic ignorance.1 However, seeing the increasing popularity of complementary and alternative medicine everywhere, I believe modern medicine will fail to confront therapeutic uncertainties unless its practitioners offer their patients what they need most as human beings in distress: time, empathy, and understanding. This is one area in which practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine seem to score clearly over those of modern medicine.

As Brown has pointed out,2 a successful medical man has to exhibit supreme confidence and decisiveness at the patient’s bedside, whereas a doctor-scientist (trying to confront uncertainties) is likely to present a picture of diffidence and self doubt. Brown says that medicine and science require complementary thought processes; the processes that work for one are devastating for the other. If this is so we need two kinds . . . [Full text of this article]

Arun S Nanivadekar, medical research consultant1

1 Mumbai 400050, India

arunn@vsnl.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Confronting therapeutic ignorance
Iain Chalmers
BMJ 2008 337: a841. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview