Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 26 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1678
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1678
Emerging evidence points to a new sequence of investigations
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The linked multicentre study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2431) of more than 1000 patients in the Netherlands reinforces previous research showing that imaging is worthwhile in acute abdominal pain severe enough to warrant hospital admission.1 2 In Laméris and colleagues study, imaging reduced clinical uncertainty and helped to eliminate a considerable number of false positive clinical diagnoses. The authors found that a strategy of using radiography followed by ultrasound worked well, with computed tomography being reserved for people with negative or inconclusive ultrasound results.1 This strategy provided the best sensitivity and the lowest radiation dose.
The success of this approach is not surprising because it effectively follows the recommendations of several national and international guidelines. Although most guidelines try to stratify imaging according to the location of the pain,3 4 these authors found that a "blanket" protocol was adequate. But patients with renal colic, for whom computed tomography has become the investigation of choice,
Adrian K Dixon, professor and honorary consultant1, Christopher J Watson, reader and honorary consultant2
1 Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, 2 Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
akd15@radiol.cam.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses