Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.0-d
On page 836, Freemantle challenges the interpretation of a new trial on the oral antidiabetic drug pioglitazone. Members of the trial's steering committee presented the results of the trial last month at a conference in Athens. The committee members claimed that the trial showed that pioglitazone, which lowers blood glucose concentration, can prevent macrovascular events. Freemantle says that this interpretation is based on secondary outcomes (the primary outcome remained neutral), and he explains why the conclusions presented may be statistically unsound and unsafe.
|
|
Credit: ASTRID AND HANNS-FRIEDER MICHLER/SPL
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses