Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332 (4 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7540.0
For inducing labouroral misoprostol solution does not lead to poorer health outcomes than vaginal prostaglandin gel. In a double blind, placebo controlled trial, Dodd and colleagues (p 509) randomised 741 women whose attending obstetrician had decided to induce labour (at 36+6 weeks' gestation or greater) either to oral misoprostola prostaglandin E1 analogueor to vaginal prostaglandin. They found that the two groups had similar rates of caesarean section, vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours, and uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changesbut the women preferred oral treatment.
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?