BMJ  2006;333 (16 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7568.0-d

Plagiarists should be publicly exposed

Plagiarism is difficult to detect, especially if it occurs in journals with a small readership. Systematic reviews can help to identify cases, but, unless perpetrators face greater sanctions the problem is unlikely to go away, says Chalmers (p 594). He explains how he identified a case of plagiarism and tried to seek explanation. He was told to handle the misconduct tactfully, but further evidence showed that the author continued to plagiarise. Chalmers concludes that journals and institutions should take allegations of plagiarism more seriously and very publicly expose authors found guilty.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak
Iain Chalmers
BMJ 2006 333: 594-596. [Full Text] [PDF]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview