Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333 (21 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7573.0-e
BMJ readers, our surveys suggest, don't like theme issues. But we offer few apologies for this one on the Middle East. In a globalised world regions can ill afford to ignore each other's health problems. As tension and distrust between Islamic countries and the West mounts, we hope this issue will promote awareness of the challenges the region faces and help promote rational debate and collaboration among doctors and policy makersin and outside it. We share Samer Jabbour's optimistic view (p 837) that action to improve health may help spur the social and political change which many of this week's contributors call for. Few of the health problems described are new; what is new is the acceptance that tackling them requires action outside, as well as inside, the health arena. "For many people in the region, health improvement must start somewhere elsewith education, equality, and security"(p 815).
When we put out our call for papers we put no proscriptive definition of the term Middle East, and there are several to chose from (see figure). Of the 150 or so submissions, of which we could, as usual, accept only a handful, most fitted best in the Analysis and Comment section and Letters pages; hence the unusual balance of this fully open access issue.
|
In a list of obstacles to health in the region (p 859) spending hugely more on defence than on health and research and development must rank high. The legacy of this investment can be seen in the rubble of Lebanon (p 848), the appalling death toll among civilians in Iraq (p 821), and the tented camps of Darfur (p 846). International action is as important here as it is in tackling common health problems from rising rates of non-communicable disease to the threat of avian flu (p 856).
We learnt a lot from putting this issue together, not least about the difficulty of avoiding causing offence. We have repeatedly been accused of anti-Zionism. We also met hatred, from the unprintable response of one Arab reviewer to a request to review a paper from a US author and the Lebanese professor who would not write for us because the issue contains Israeli voices. But we have felt the warmth, inspiration, and fortitude of many more. As editors we weekly brace ourselves for highly critical online rapid responses (and braced we are, gentle reader, although "we come not to offend"). Some of this week's contributors risk bullets.
Tessa Richards, assistant editor1, Christiane Rehwagen, editorial registrar
1 (trichards{at}bmj.com)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses