Rapid Responses to:

OBSERVATIONS:
Iona Heath
Dare to use your own intelligence
BMJ 2008; 337: a1319 [Full text]
*Rapid Responses: Submit a response to this article

Rapid Responses published:

[Read Rapid Response] Straw clutching.
Simon D Price   (26 August 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] "I was only obeying orders"
GH Hall   (26 August 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Re: "I was only obeying orders"
David G Tucker   (27 August 2008)

Straw clutching. 26 August 2008
 Next Rapid Response Top
Simon D Price,
GP
Newport np10 9hw

Send response to journal:
Re: Straw clutching.

The drowning man may clutch at a straw only to find that NICE have plucked it from the water. There are times when even faint hope is worth trying. I fully support NICE but exceptions should be allowed.

Competing interests: One day I may die of cancer.

"I was only obeying orders" 26 August 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
GH Hall,
Retired physician
EX1 2HW

Send response to journal:
Re: "I was only obeying orders"

Heath is right. Guidelines provide a good excuse not to make individually determined decisions. "The man in Whitehall knows best." It is fully understandable that practitioners heave a sigh of relief when the latest directives come from on high. But the experts must be identifiable, accessible, answerable and respond to questions quickly and honestly. Anyone who has tried to get the truth about the safety and efficacy of current influenza vaccines, for example, will know how difficult this is. Or,why are the out of date Framingham equations still used in cardiovascular risk assessment? This is the area where a bit more soul searching and scientific humility is badly needed. One recalls the old gibe- "Just because something is approved by all the experts it doesn't necessarily mean it is wrong."

Incentives, however, as in the QOF payments, are highly suspect ethically. Even the GMC condemns them (for drug firms but not government) if they persuade doctors to do something they would not otherwise do. This rather begs the question "Why otherwise would they be offered?"

Competing interests: None declared

Re: "I was only obeying orders" 27 August 2008
Previous Rapid Response  Top
David G Tucker,
Therapist
hants SP10

Send response to journal:
Re: Re: "I was only obeying orders"

My thoughts entirely.

I have been tryng, with no success whatsoever, to obtain vaccine efficacy figures and vaccine status data, for the usual regular vaccines and relevant patients.The HPA have been ignoring my requests for status figures, which I believe they collect and collate from notification forms. Maybe someone here can help with this please? It unsurprisingly creates much wonder as to why efficacy and 'breakthrough'...(what a quaint phrase that is!)data are not widely available.One would expect a vaccine's 'highly effective' label to be independently verified...then again, maybe not. If I was producing a product with amazing success rates I would shout about it....not keep bringing out 'new and improved' versions. Perhaps it is me and I am at fault for missing something here?

Competing interests: None declared